Life Insurance Lawyer Rutland Vt

Our Rutland VT life insurance lawyers are here to help. We serve all states. Free consultation. No fee unless settlement.

2025 Rutland Vermont Denied Life Insurance Claims

Senior Life Insurance misrepresentation $120,000.00
Choice Mutual interpleader claim between spouse and ex spouse $204,000.00
Texas Life coronavirus death case denial $109,000.00
Aflac Life dispute among beneficiaries children versus spouse $111,000.00
Midland National beneficiary dispute $106,000.00
Unified Life COVID 19 denial of benefits claim won $67,000.00
FEGLI appeal resolved with one legal brief $348,000.00
Overseas death denial death certificate not recognized $545,000.00
Cincinnati Insurance felony exclusion $203,000.00
Nippon Life lapse of policy missed payment $44,000.00
Old American incorrect social security number $75,000.00
Industrial life policy lapse before death claim $81,000.00
Denied ADD claim Rutland Vermont $100,000.00
Funeral Directors life misrepresentation $206,000.00
KY Life alcohol denial of benefits won by us $59,000.00
Northwestern Mutual beneficiary dispute $122,000.00
AVMA Life insurance exclusion won by us $98,000.00
Provident Life competing beneficiaries $57,000.00
Landmark fraud with respect to application $25,000.00

Interpleader Lawyer Rutland Vermont

Here's an example scenario of a life insurance interpleader involving a denied life insurance claim with a spouse and an ex-spouse:

John had a life insurance policy with a death benefit of $500,000, naming his spouse, Sarah, as the primary beneficiary. However, after John's passing, the insurance company denied the claim citing a potential issue with the policy. John had failed to disclose his previous marriage to Emily, and Emily's attorney notifies the insurance company of her claim to the proceeds as the ex-spouse.

In response to the conflicting claims, the insurance company files a life insurance interpleader action in court. This legal action is taken to deposit the policy proceeds with the court and let the court decide who the rightful beneficiary is.

Sarah argues that she was John's lawful spouse at the time of his death and therefore entitled to the insurance proceeds. However, Emily claims that she was still entitled to a portion of the proceeds because John failed to remove her as a beneficiary after their divorce, and she was still listed as the beneficiary on the policy.

The court reviews the evidence presented by both parties, including the divorce decree and any relevant documents related to the insurance policy. After considering all the facts and applicable laws, the court determines that Sarah is indeed the rightful beneficiary of the life insurance proceeds, as she was the legal spouse at the time of John's death and the policy was never updated to remove her as the primary beneficiary.

The court orders the $500,000 to be released to Sarah, resolving the dispute between the two claimants. Emily's claim is denied, and the insurance company fulfills its obligation by releasing the funds to the designated beneficiary, Sarah.