Life Insurance Lawyer Rutland Vermont

Our Rutland VT life insurance lawyers are here to help. We serve all states. Free consultation. No fee unless settlement.

What are some ways that accidental death and dismemberment claims can be denied, and how can they be challenged?

Accidental death life insurance claims may be denied for several reasons, often revolving around policy exclusions, misrepresentations, or failure to meet specific criteria. Firstly, if the cause of death falls outside the policy's definition of "accidental death," such as deaths resulting from pre-existing medical conditions, illness, or suicide, the claim may be rejected. Insurance companies typically have strict definitions of what constitutes an accident, and deaths not meeting these criteria may not be covered.

Secondly, failure to disclose relevant information during the application process can lead to claim denial. If the insured provided false or incomplete information about their medical history, occupation, lifestyle habits, or other material facts, the insurer may deny the claim based on misrepresentation. Even unintentional errors or omissions can provide grounds for claim denial if the insurer determines that the undisclosed information could have affected their decision to issue the policy or its terms.

Lastly, certain policy exclusions may invalidate coverage for specific circumstances. Common exclusions include deaths resulting from participation in hazardous activities, such as extreme sports or illegal activities, or deaths that occur outside the coverage territory specified in the policy. It's crucial for policyholders to thoroughly review their insurance contracts to understand the terms, conditions, and exclusions to avoid surprises during the claims process. In case of a denial, policyholders can often appeal the decision or seek legal recourse if they believe the denial is unjustified.

If an AD&D claim is denied, the policyholder or their beneficiaries may challenge the decision by filing an appeal with the insurance company. This can involve providing additional evidence or documentation to support the claim, or disputing the insurance company's interpretation of the policy language. If the appeal is still denied, the policyholder or their beneficiaries may need to pursue legal action to recover the benefits under the policy. It is advisable to consult with an attorney who specializes in insurance law to determine the best course of action.

2023-2024 Rutland Vermont Denied Life Insurance Claims Resolved

Senior Life Insurance misrepresentation $120,000.00
Choice Mutual interpleader claim between spouse and ex spouse $204,000.00
Texas Life coronavirus death case denial $109,000.00
Aflac Life dispute among beneficiaries children versus spouse $111,000.00
Midland National beneficiary dispute $106,000.00
Unified Life COVID 19 denial of benefits claim won $67,000.00
FEGLI appeal resolved with one legal brief $348,000.00
Overseas death denial death certificate not recognized $545,000.00
Cincinnati Insurance felony exclusion $203,000.00
Nippon Life lapse of policy missed payment $44,000.00
Old American incorrect social security number $75,000.00
Industrial life policy lapse before death claim $81,000.00
Denied ADD claim Rutland Vermont $100,000.00
Funeral Directors life misrepresentation $206,000.00
KY Life alcohol denial of benefits won by us $59,000.00
Northwestern Mutual beneficiary dispute $122,000.00
AVMA Life insurance exclusion won by us $98,000.00
Provident Life competing beneficiaries $57,000.00
Landmark fraud with respect to application $25,000.00

Interpleader Lawyer Rutland Vermont

Here's an example scenario of a life insurance interpleader involving a denied life insurance claim with a spouse and an ex-spouse:

John had a life insurance policy with a death benefit of $500,000, naming his spouse, Sarah, as the primary beneficiary. However, after John's passing, the insurance company denied the claim citing a potential issue with the policy. John had failed to disclose his previous marriage to Emily, and Emily's attorney notifies the insurance company of her claim to the proceeds as the ex-spouse.

In response to the conflicting claims, the insurance company files a life insurance interpleader action in court. This legal action is taken to deposit the policy proceeds with the court and let the court decide who the rightful beneficiary is.

Sarah argues that she was John's lawful spouse at the time of his death and therefore entitled to the insurance proceeds. However, Emily claims that she was still entitled to a portion of the proceeds because John failed to remove her as a beneficiary after their divorce, and she was still listed as the beneficiary on the policy.

The court reviews the evidence presented by both parties, including the divorce decree and any relevant documents related to the insurance policy. After considering all the facts and applicable laws, the court determines that Sarah is indeed the rightful beneficiary of the life insurance proceeds, as she was the legal spouse at the time of John's death and the policy was never updated to remove her as the primary beneficiary.

The court orders the $500,000 to be released to Sarah, resolving the dispute between the two claimants. Emily's claim is denied, and the insurance company fulfills its obligation by releasing the funds to the designated beneficiary, Sarah.