Life Insurance Company X files an interpleader action to determine the rightful beneficiary of a life insurance policy issued to the deceased. The policy had a death benefit of $500,000 and named two beneficiaries: Jane Smith, the ex-wife of John Smith, and Mary Jones, the girlfriend of John Smith at the time of his death. Jane Smith claimed that she was entitled to the entire policy proceeds because she was still married to John Smith when he purchased the policy and did not consent to any change of beneficiary. Mary Jones claimed that she was entitled to the entire policy proceeds because John Smith changed the beneficiary designation in her favor after he divorced Jane Smith and before he died. Prudential Life Insurance Company deposited the policy proceeds into the court registry and sought to be discharged from further liability.
The main issue in this case was whether John Smith validly changed the beneficiary of his life insurance policy from Jane Smith to Mary Jones. Some states require that a change of beneficiary must be made in writing and signed by the policy owner, while other states allow a change of beneficiary by any clear expression of intent. Additionally, some states have statutes that automatically revoke a beneficiary designation upon divorce, unless the policy owner reaffirms it or waives the revocation.
In this case, it is not clear which state law governs the policy and what evidence exists to support either claim. If the policy was issued in a state that requires a written and signed change of beneficiary, then Mary Jones would have to produce such a document to prove her claim. If the policy was issued in a state that allows a change of beneficiary by any clear expression of intent, then Mary Jones would have to show that John Smith clearly intended to make her the beneficiary, such as by telling her or someone else, or by making other arrangements consistent with that intent. If the policy was issued in a state that automatically revokes a beneficiary designation upon divorce, then Jane Smith would have to show that John Smith reaffirmed or waived the revocation after he divorced her.
The court would have to weigh the evidence and arguments presented by both parties and decide who is entitled to the policy proceeds. Alternatively, the court could order a settlement or mediation between the parties to resolve the dispute.
Free Consultation 800-330-2274