Alleging fraud and misrepresentation on the application, Brighthouse Life Insurance denied a woman’s life insurance claim after her husband died. The woman filed against Brighthouse Life Insurance, claiming that her husband was truthful about his medical history and that Brighthouse Life Insurance acted in bad faith. The parties settled the case out of court.
Brighthouse Life Insurance denied a man’s life insurance claim for his wife based on a suicide clause. The man argued in court that his wife died accidentally from a drug overdose, not by suicide. The court sided with the man.
Based on a policy lapse, Brighthouse Life Insurance denied a woman’s life insurance claim for her son. The woman sued Brighthouse Life Insurance, claiming that she paid the premiums on time and that the insurer failed to notify her of the cancellation. The court found that the policy hadn’t lapsed due to non-payment and that Brighthouse Life Insurance hadn’t sent proper notices.
Brighthouse Life Insurance denied a man’s life insurance claim for his father based on an exclusion for death resulting from a criminal act. The man filed against Brighthouse Life Insurance, claiming that his father was not involved in any criminal activity and that Brighthouse Life Insurance acted in bad faith. The parties settled the case out of court.
An agent mistake was the basis for Brighthouse Life Insurance’s denial of a woman’s life insurance claim for her husband. The woman pursued a claim against Brighthouse Life Insurance, claiming that the agent who sold the policy misrepresented the coverage and failed to disclose important exclusions. The court found that Brighthouse Life Insurance was liable for the agent’s negligence.
Brighthouse Life Insurance denied a man’s life insurance claim for his brother based on a contestability clause. The man filed suit against Brighthouse Life Insurance, claiming that his brother did not lie about his health condition and that insurance company acted in bad faith. The court found that the insurer did not have sufficient evidence to prove fraud or misrepresentation.
A pre-existing condition exclusion was the reason for Brighthouse Life Insurance’s denial of a woman’s life insurance claim for her daughter. The woman sued claiming that her daughter did not have any pre-existing condition and that the insurer acted in bad faith. The court determined that Brighthouse Life Insurance did not have a valid basis to deny the claim.
A beneficiary dispute was the issue for Brighthouse Life Insurance s denial of a man’s life insurance claim for his mother. The man sued claiming that he was the rightful beneficiary of the policy and that the insurance company wrongfully paid another person. The court found for the man.
A forgery allegation was the ground for Brighthouse Life Insurance’s denial of a woman’s life insurance claim for her father. The woman filed against the insurer, alleging that her father signed the policy application and that Brighthouse Life Insurance acted in bad faith. The court found that the signature on the application wasn’t forged.
A material change in risk was the factor for Brighthouse Life Insurance’s denial of a man’s life insurance claim for his son. The man filed, claiming that his son did not engage in any risky behavior and that Brighthouse Life Insurance acted in bad faith. The court found for the man.
Free consultation 800-330-2274